Skip to content

Update gh-sponsor-meta.json#829

Merged
tannerlinsley merged 1 commit intoTanStack:mainfrom
netroutingcom:patch-1
Apr 15, 2026
Merged

Update gh-sponsor-meta.json#829
tannerlinsley merged 1 commit intoTanStack:mainfrom
netroutingcom:patch-1

Conversation

@netroutingcom
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@netroutingcom netroutingcom commented Apr 15, 2026

Added new sponsor Netrouting.com.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a new sponsor entry to the platform.

Added new sponsor Netrouting.com.
@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Apr 15, 2026

👷 Deploy request for tanstack pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 20124f3

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 15, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new sponsor entry with login netroutingcom is added to the sponsor metadata JSON file, including name, image URL, and link URL fields. No existing entries were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Sponsor Metadata
src/utils/gh-sponsor-meta.json
Added new sponsor entry for netroutingcom with associated metadata (name, image URL, link URL).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A sponsor hops in, fresh and new,
With metadata gleaming in morning dew,
The JSON sings with grateful cheer,
netroutingcom is welcomed here! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Update gh-sponsor-meta.json' is vague and generic, using only the filename without conveying what was actually changed or why. Consider a more descriptive title like 'Add Netrouting.com sponsor entry to gh-sponsor-meta.json' that clearly indicates the main change.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Warning

⚠️ This pull request might be slop. It has been flagged by CodeRabbit slop detection and should be reviewed carefully.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@src/utils/gh-sponsor-meta.json`:
- Around line 2-7: The JSON sponsor entry with "login": "netroutingcom" is
invalid and will be dropped by sponsors.functions.ts because it lacks a valid
GitHub login and no fallback "amount" field; fix it by either (A) correcting the
"login" value to the actual GitHub username for this sponsor, (B) adding a
numeric "amount" field to the same object (keys "login", "name", "imageUrl",
"linkUrl") so it won’t be filtered out, or (C) removing the entire object if no
valid GitHub account or amount is available; update the entry so downstream code
in sponsors.functions.ts retains or properly identifies this sponsor.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 60ed0532-7639-4162-a732-9a0c0d13918f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 004be5c and 20124f3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/utils/gh-sponsor-meta.json

Comment on lines +2 to +7
{
"login": "netroutingcom",
"name": "Netrouting.com",
"imageUrl": "https://netrouting.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/netrouting-color.png",
"linkUrl": "https://netrouting.com/"
},
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🌐 Web query:

Confirm whether the GitHub account login is exactly "netroutingcom" (case-sensitive), and whether that same login appears in TanStack’s GitHub Sponsors list.

💡 Result:

No evidence found that a GitHub account with the exact case-sensitive login "netroutingcom" exists. Searches for github.com/netroutingcom, "netroutingcom" as a GitHub user, and related terms returned no matching user profile. The domain netrouting.com exists and references GitHub in blog posts (e.g., benchmark script on GitHub), but no specific "netroutingcom" account is identified. No evidence that "netroutingcom" appears in TanStack’s GitHub Sponsors list. TanStack sponsors via tannerlinsley GitHub Sponsors page (190 sponsors, list not publicly detailed in results), and tanstack.com/partners page lists partners like Netlify, Neon, but no "netroutingcom" or Netrouting. No mentions in sponsor-related pages or commits.

Citations:


Remove or correct the invalid login value "netroutingcom".

No GitHub account exists with the login "netroutingcom" (searched both case-sensitive and across public GitHub). This entry has no amount field fallback, so it will be silently dropped during processing by sponsors.functions.ts. Either correct the login to match an actual GitHub sponsor, add an amount field to ensure the entry is retained, or remove the entry entirely.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@src/utils/gh-sponsor-meta.json` around lines 2 - 7, The JSON sponsor entry
with "login": "netroutingcom" is invalid and will be dropped by
sponsors.functions.ts because it lacks a valid GitHub login and no fallback
"amount" field; fix it by either (A) correcting the "login" value to the actual
GitHub username for this sponsor, (B) adding a numeric "amount" field to the
same object (keys "login", "name", "imageUrl", "linkUrl") so it won’t be
filtered out, or (C) removing the entire object if no valid GitHub account or
amount is available; update the entry so downstream code in
sponsors.functions.ts retains or properly identifies this sponsor.

@tannerlinsley tannerlinsley merged commit bb71e9b into TanStack:main Apr 15, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants